Strategyproofness, Leontief Economies and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present new characterizations of the Raiffa and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions based on strategyproofness of an allocation mechanism for an underlying economy with Leontief preferences. Our first result shows that the 2-player Kalai-Smorodinsky solution is the unique bargaining solution which if Efficient, Symmetric, Scale Invariant and Strategyproof on a Leontief economy. Next we consider the class of weighted DRF mechanisms which are of great practical interest and are group strategyproof. We show that they satisfy and are characterized by a new proportional consistency axiom, Ratio Consistency, and that the multi-player Raiffa solution is the unique unique weighted DRF mechanism that generates a bargaining solution. Finally, we present a result that complements Imai’s characterization of the multi-player lexicographic-Kalai-Smorodinsky solution. We show that strategyproofness, combined with other basic axioms, implies a version of the individually rational individual monotonicity which when combined with the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives other than Ideal Point axiom characterizes the lexicographic-Kalai-Smorodinsky solution for 3-players and is conjectured to characterize it for an arbitrary number of players. These results shed new light and provide new insights into the study of mechanisms on Leontief economies and bargaining theory as well as having practical applications in the design of modern data-centers and cloud computing platforms.
منابع مشابه
Bridging the gap between the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solutions
Bargaining solutions that satisfy weak Pareto optimality, symmetry, and independence of equivalent utility representations are called standard. The Nash (1950) solution is the unique independent standard solution and the KalaiSmorodinsky (1975) solution is the unique monotonic standard solution. Every standard solution satisfies midpoint domination on triangles, or MDT for short. I introduce a ...
متن کاملDuality, area-considerations, and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution
We introduce a new solution concept for 2-person bargaining problems, which can be considered as the dual of the Equal-Area solution (EA) (see Anbarcı and Bigelow (1994)). Hence, we call it the Dual EqualArea solution (DEA). We show that the point selected by the Kalai–Smorodinsky solution (see Kalai and Smorodinsky (1975)) lies in between those that are selected by EA and DEA. We formulate an ...
متن کاملFocal points in bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution
The Kalai-Smorodinsky solution is characterized by three axioms: balanced focal point, disagreement point monotonicity, and restricted IIA.
متن کاملTwo support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets
Wediscuss two support results for the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solution in the context of an object division problem involving two agents. Strategic interaction determines an allocation of objects, so that evaluationwith individual utilities constitute the payoffs in the derived games. These allocations of objects are obtained through individual demand in a specific market for objects. For ...
متن کاملStability, Fairness and Random Walks in the Bargaining Problem
We study the classical bargaining problem and its two canonical solutions, (Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky), from a novel point of view: we ask for stability of the solution if both players are able distort the underlying bargaining process by reference to a third party (e.g. a court). By exploring the simplest case, where decisions of the third party are made randomly we obtain a stable solution, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011